The Great Organic Food Debate of 2012


So what’s the story with organic foods?

Are they worth the extra money? Are they healthier for us? For the planet? In recent weeks, you’ve probably heard and/or read about a recent study at Stanford University that stirred up quite a controversy. You may also have heard that Monsanto was reportedly one of the sponsors of the study.

An early morning view of the Oakes organic farm in Florida — this is the kind of place that I like to think my food is grown — without harming the environment or a single creature.

A week or so after the news came out, I mentioned the organic controversy briefly in one of my blogs—as just another example of the “confusion over clarity” mentality that exists throughout our extended system of food, government, academia, medicine, insurance and media.

Confusion over clarity is what helps maintain the status quo for the 35 million people working in our extended “system.” And it’s the status quo that is killing our people, bankrupting our nation, and destroying the ecological harmony of our planet.

In this post, I will share a few excerpts from Roger Cohen’s Organic Fable piece—followed by a few selected comments about his column that were featured in a subsequent New York Times article entitled Organic Food – Truths and Fables.  Links to both are provided below. Let’s begin with a few sarcastic quotes from Mr. Cohen (regular NY Times columnist) on the topic of organic:

An effective form of premium branding rather than a science, a slogan rather than better nutrition, “organic” has oozed over the menus, markets and malls of the world’s upscale neighborhood at a remarkable pace. In 2010, according to the Organic Trade Association, organic food and drink sales totaled $26.7 billion in the United States, or about 4 percent of the overall market, having grown steadily since 2000. The British organic market is also large; menus like to mention that bacon comes from pampered pigs at the Happy Hog farm down the road.

So I cheered this week when Stanford University concluded, after examining four decades of research, that fruits and vegetables labeled organic are, on average, no more nutritious than their cheaper conventional counterparts. The study also found that organic meats offered no obvious health advantages. And it found that organic food was not less likely to be contaminated by dangerous bacteria like E.coli.

Logically, the organic movement should favor genetically modified produce. If you cannot use pesticides or fertilizers, you might at least want to modify your crops so they are more resilient and plentiful. But that would go against the ideology and romance of a movement that says: We are for nature, everyone else is against nature.

Organic is a fable of the pampered parts of the planet — romantic and comforting. Now, thanks to Stanford researchers, we know just how replete with myth the “O” fable is.

Roger Cohen of the New York Times

My reaction. Mr. Cohen does not understand the big picture. Organic farming is all about growing food for humans in a sustainable, Earth-friendly manner. He doesn’t understand that the vast majority of our agriculture is part of the process of growing food for animals that we eat. He also doesn’t understand that we shouldn’t be eating all those food animals in the first place.

Now, he has taken the results of one lopsided study and used them to vent all of his previous frustrations about a process that he doesn’t come close to understanding. And, in so doing, he has generated an avalanche of opinions in direct opposition to his. From the 9-13-12 article shown below; a few selected comments from readers:

Roger Cohen’s column “The organic fable” (Views, Sept. 6) dismisses the benefits of small-scale organic farming, casting proponents of organic food as narcissistic and elitist. The narcissistic view is in fact the one that assumes humanity can continually grow its population, along with its food supply, by using techniques that rely on finite and depleting resources for fuel, pesticides and other inputs even while contributing to climate change and other ecological harms that threaten to upend agricultural systems around the world.

Cohen does a disservice to his stated goal of feeding the world by avoiding questions of sustainability and assuming “conventional” agriculture can continue in perpetuity.

Jeremy Abramowitz, Washington

Mr. Cohen speaks with apparent ignorance of the impact of the chemical farming system on our world and especially our health. He also has been sold a bill of goods about organic farming’s low yields. Quite to the contrary, all of us who have grown food with a nonchemical approach recognize that by building the soil with “organic” materials such as compost, yields can be quite competitive. And the land won’t have to abandoned after years of chemical dumping.

All the solutions to our hunger challenges are right in front of our noses. We just refuse to see them, because they are not convenient. What if we subsidized local farming instead of big oil, big agriculture and big chemicals?

Bill Alstrom, York, Maine

Who knew that a single Stanford meta-analysis could provide a human being with the wealth of generalizations and conclusions that Mr. Cohen was able to sift from it. I sure hope he uses his ability to extract so much from so little to lead the charge to feed the world’s 9 billion people. The sky is the limit when you are unhindered by pesky elitist worries for the health of farm workers and their families, small farm owners, unpatented seeds, viable soil, manageable weeds, overly influential multinational corporations, biodiversity, links to cancer, rampant childhood autoimmune disease, untested genetically modified organisms being tested on all of us, and so forth.

Doug Rankin, West Hartford, Connecticut

Consecutive Daily Blogs (numerals provided today by a highway sign in Italy)

For your convenience, I have provided links to the two articles featured above. Also there is a link to my recent article about confusion over clarity.

The Bottom Line. As for clarity, it’s all about growing healthy food for people—by farmers who care about the land. And the closer to home the better. Then, by simply eating these nutritious foods, we can take charge of our own health and so much more.

Handy 4-piece take-charge-of-your-health kit—from Amazon.com

Want to find out how healthy your family is eating? Take our free 4Leaf Diagnostic Survey. It takes less than five minutes and you can score it yourself. After taking the survey, please give me your feedback as it will be helpful in the development of our future 4Leaf app for smartphones. Send feedback to jmorrishicks@me.com

International. We’re now reaching people in over 100 countries. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter or get daily blog notices by “following” us in the top of the right-hand column. For occasional updates, join our periodic mailing list.

To order more of my favorite books—visit our online BookStore now

J. Morris Hicks, working daily to promote health, hope and harmony on planet Earth.

For help in your own quest to take charge of your health, you might find some useful information at our 4Leaf page or some great recipes at Lisa’s 4Leaf Kitchen.

Got a question? Let me hear from you at jmorrishicks@me.com. Or give me a call on my cell at 917-399-9700.

SHARE and rate this post below.

Blogging daily at hpjmh.com…from the seaside village of Stonington, Connecticut – Be well and have a great day.

—J. Morris Hicks, board member, T. Colin Campbell Foundation

About J. Morris Hicks

A former strategic management consultant and senior corporate executive with Ralph Lauren in New York, J. Morris Hicks has always focused on the "big picture" when analyzing any issue. In 2002, after becoming curious about our "optimal diet," he began a study of what we eat from a global perspective ---- discovering many startling issues and opportunities along the way. In addition to an MBA and a BS in Industrial Engineering, he holds a certificate in plant-based nutrition from the T. Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies, where he has also been a member of the board of directors since 2012. Having concluded that our food choices hold the key to the sustainability of our civilization, he has made this his #1 priority---exploring all avenues for influencing humans everywhere to move back to the natural plant-based diet for our species.
This entry was posted in Organic, local produce. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Great Organic Food Debate of 2012

  1. km says:

    If you live in California and care about this issue, please vote YES on 37 if you want your food to be labeled. http://www.carighttoknow.org/ The word “Stanford” has been swapped for “Monsanto” and it’s making my blood boil! A recent NPR host seemed to be fooled by the wolf in sheeps clothing as well. Thank you for this post! Some days I feel like you are the only good guy out there fighting for truth & justice. Thank you.

  2. billkranker1 says:

    J.

    I kind of understand where the misguided Mr. Cohen may have been headed with his article. Too often our food labels get misused by packagers to stretch the meaning of the term. I have seen it with both “Vegan” and “Organic”. Very many times we are led to believe that something is healthy for us just because we see the word organic or vegan on the box when in fact the product is far from it. I think a great example of this would be “organic raised beef” Many people will continue to consume animal foods which are clearly not very healthy for humans just because they believe they have been raised humainly. Also just because the word “vegan” is placed on a product does not mean it is health promoting. Often vegan foods can be worse than the foods they are meant to replace.

    The real truth is that people need to get past these labels and start to get more deeply educated about the human diet. A little common sense also goes a long way. Does anyone trully believe that we were meant to eat Tofurky!

    Bill

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s