“Drill Baby, Drill” is not the answer; nor is Newt’s $2.50/gal.

Good News and Bad News — an Update on Oil

We hear a lot about the price of oil and gasoline in the Western world—particularly during an election year in the United States. Four years ago, McCain and Palin were irresponsibly screaming, “Drill baby drill,” and now Newt Gingrich is (was) promising a plan for delivering gasoline for $2.50 a gallon if he is elected. Some of this kind of “madness” is necessary to get elected in a country like ours—where the electorate blames the sitting president for unemployment numbers and for the price of gasoline. But none of this kind of “madness” is going to solve the grim reality of our collective global dependence on oil.

All the talk about the price of gasoline during this election year—coupled with the latest article on the cover of Time (see link below)—has influenced me to write an update on this crucial topic. Crucial not just for getting elected, but crucial for the survival of our species if we mis-manage the finite resources that we have left.

A little background. Chapter 5 in our book is entitled “The End of the Era of Cheap Oil,” — not a chapter you would normally expect to see in a book about healthy eating. But our book goes far beyond our own health and takes a hard look at four other compelling categories of reasons that we should be eating whole plants—not animals and their products.

As for oil, it turns out the the way we eat is the single largest category of how we are “wasting” this finite resource. The small print on the cover of the magazine gives us a clue about the “good news and bad news” in the article:

“New breakthroughs are actually increasing U.S. supplies. But homegrown oil isn’t going to lower prices at the pump.”

Promoting health, hope and harmony on planet Earth

What's good for our health, is also good for the planet---and for conserving oil.

Many of my blogs have featured all of the five categories of compelling reasons and can be reviewed by hovering over the “Topics” tab above. This particular blog is an update on the “energy issues” topic—particularly the future availability of cheap oil. What do I mean by cheap? I mean “cheap enough” to squander in a process so insanely inefficient as producing food calories  in the form of meat and dairy. Insanely inefficient?

On average, meat and dairy calories require more than ten times as much fossil fuel energy to produce—on a per calorie basis—than do whole, plant-based foods.

Oh, we waste a lot of energy with our plant-based foods too, but that waste is a mere drop in the bucket compared to our meat and dairy production business. In our book, we reported that the process of “cycling” our grain through animals for our food is a process that wastes “90% of the protein, 96% of the calories, 100% of the fiber and 100% of the carbohydrates.” It also requires over ten times as much land and water—but this article is focused on the energy side of this mess.

Example of "peak oil." All countries, and eventually the world, will reach its peak oil production.

Back to the Time article. Bryan Walsh gives us a comprehensive “big picture” of what’s going on with our oil supply, although he hardly even mentions the “peak oil” phenomenon. Simply stated, peak oil means that eventually the world’s daily production of oil will peak and—no matter what we do—the grand total daily production of oil will steadily decline. What we’re now seeing in the Time article appears to be the reality of the early years of peak oil. Many experts believe that we’re at peak oil now.

What Mr. Walsh describes is five new “categories” of oil production that has been made possible by a combination of new technology and price. In other words, we now have the high-tech tools to dig deeper and differently—AND the higher prices are making those more expensive methods economically feasible.

Is peak oil a myth or a hoax? Like global warming, there is much debate surrounding this topic. But there is universal agreement on these three points:

  1. Oil is a finite resource (not renewable)
  2. So far, we have taken about a trillion barrels out of the ground.
  3. We have harvested the easiest, the safest and the cheapest trillion barrels first.

We can change the way we eat much quicker than we can change the way we live and travel. Eventually, we will have to do all of the above.

How much oil is harvestable in the future? My earlier research for the book seems to be corroborated by the Time article—that is that we have roughly one trillion barrels remaining. And since we’ve used the majority of our first trillion in less than fifty years, we know that the last trillion barrels are not going to last forever. From the article, Walsh sums up the “big picture:”

While unconventional sources promise to keep the supply of oil flowing, it won’t flow as easily as it did for most of the 20th century. The new supplies are for the most part more expensive than traditional oil from places like the Middle East, sometimes significantly so. They are often dirtier, with higher risks of accidents.

The decline of major conventional oil fields and the rise in demand mean the spare production capacity that once cushioned prices could be gone, ushering in an era of volatile market swings. And burning all this leftover oil could lock the world into dangerous climate change. “I’m less concerned about the absolute disappearance of fossil fuels than about the environmental consequences of pursuing what’s left,” says Michael Klare, an energy expert and the author of The Race for What’s Left. There will be oil, but it will be expensive, dirty and dangerous.

Gorilla in the room–NEW DEMAND. Although the USA and other Western nations are actually using less oil these days, demand continues to grow sharply in the developing world. Specifically, millions of people in China and India are just now beginning to drive automobiles. And the oil market is global—which means that we can’t control the prices. And that “we” means Newt, McCain/Palin, or Barack Obama. The price of oil—for as long as we have it—will fluctuate based on the global supply and demand.

The Bottom Line. The single largest opportunity to conserve this finite natural resource is to change the way we eat in the Western world. Certainly, it will also help if we change the way we live at the same time—it would just take a lot longer to to that.

As an added bonus for changing the way we eat, we’ll also lessen the future energy demand in the developing world as they follow our lead by choosing the healthier, more efficient and far greener option of eating whole plants. What could be simpler?

(An earlier post) Finite Fossil Fuels…3 ways to make them last longer

Want to learn more about the “energy issues?” Click here.  And for the Time article….

Time Article The Truth About Oil


Want to find out how healthy your family is eating? Take our free 4Leaf Diagnostic Survey It takes less than five minutes and you can score it yourself. After taking the survey, please give me your feedback as it will be helpful in the development of our future 4Leaf app for smartphones. Send feedback to jmorrishicks@me.com

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter. Want to receive some occasional special news from us? You may wish to Join our periodic mailing listFor daily updates you can choose to “FOLLOW” at the top of the right column.

If you’d like to order our book on Amazon,  visit our BookStore now.

J. Morris Hicks, working daily to promote health, hope and harmony on planet Earth.

For help in your own quest to take charge of your health, you might find some useful information at our 4Leaf page or some great recipes at Lisa’s 4Leaf Kitchen.

Got a question? Let me hear from you at jmorrishicks@me.com.

Please SHARE and rate this post below

Blogging daily at hpjmh.com…from the seaside village of Stonington, Connecticut – Be well and have a great day.

—J. Morris Hicks, Board of Directors…

About J. Morris Hicks

A former strategic management consultant and senior corporate executive with Ralph Lauren in New York, J. Morris Hicks has always focused on the "big picture" when analyzing any issue. In 2002, after becoming curious about our "optimal diet," he began a study of what we eat from a global perspective ---- discovering many startling issues and opportunities along the way. In addition to an MBA and a BS in Industrial Engineering, he holds a certificate in plant-based nutrition from the T. Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies, where he has also been a member of the board of directors since 2012. Having concluded that our food choices hold the key to the sustainability of our civilization, he has made this his #1 priority---exploring all avenues for influencing humans everywhere to move back to the natural plant-based diet for our species.
This entry was posted in Energy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to “Drill Baby, Drill” is not the answer; nor is Newt’s $2.50/gal.

  1. Leo S. says:

    Here is some information on increased installation of wind power.


  2. Leo S. says:


    Jay Leno has averaged 2391.3 MPG in his VOLT. Others might do better depending on their driving needs. He would do even better if he drove an electric vehicle (EV). Jay has a wind turbine and solar panels on his garage roof so sometimes he produces more electricity than he needs. With rising gas prices and the prospect of no oil being available at some time it might be necessary to have an EV so one could travel to some degree. Many people today would be able to have an EV for daily use. There would be less pollution and the drive would be very quiet.

    • Leo S. says:

      The Electrfication Coalition has a 176-page booklet (Electrification Roadmap) that discusses the issues concerning the electrification of the transportation system. It can be downloaded as a PDF and might still also be available in printed form. They also have one for fleets. The phone number is 202-461-2360. Your library should have a copy to lend out to the public.

      electrification coalition

    • Linda201 says:

      Jay Leno may be harnessing wind and solar to power his electric car, but the vast majority of people who have electric cars plug them into outlets in their garages, and future buyers will be doing the same. Where does the vast majority of residential electricity come from? Coal. So although we might use less oil, coal is also fossil fuel and burning it is horrible for the environment. So is the answer NOT electric cars, but rather more efficient hybrids where the act of driving charges the battery?

      • Leo S. says:

        Jay Leno uses renewable energy to power his garage/business and can use some of that to charge his car. Power plants still use coal but are making the effort to supply more renewable energy so the source will be cleaner. As solar, wind, hydroelectric and geothermal generation increase less coal will be needed. A hybrid does get better mileage than a regular car but still uses gas for the engine or to generate electricity for the motor in the case of the VOLT, which requires premium gas which costs more, and still emits pollution via the tailpipe. Pollution produced by the generation of electricity from coal can be controlled better at the power plant than at each individual auto. As the power plant gets cleaner so is the electricity delivered to the cars, the homes or businesses. The hybrid still produces pollution which is emitted by the tailpipe. The electric auto has no tailpipe and emits no pollution. It also does not need radiators, mufflers, oil changes, gasoline, has fewer moving parts and is really quiet when running. As electric transportation increases air pollution will lessen. People in many cities throughout the world would like to have less pollution.

        Check out the website EV World for weekly articles on transportation and energy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s